TSTP Solution File: SEV410^5 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV410^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:24:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 3.81s
% Output   : Proof 3.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SEV410^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 01:43:39 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.49/3.81  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/3.81  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not ((cP fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) → Exists fun Xu => And (cP Xu) (∀ (Xx : Iota), cA Xx → Xu Xx))) True
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq ((cP fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) → Exists fun Xu => And (cP Xu) (∀ (Xx : Iota), cA Xx → Xu Xx)) False
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (cP fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) True
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Exists fun Xu => And (cP Xu) (∀ (Xx : Iota), cA Xx → Xu Xx)) False
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop), Eq (And (cP a) (∀ (Xx : Iota), cA Xx → a Xx)) False
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop), Or (Eq (cP a) False) (Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), cA Xx → a Xx) False)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cP a) False) (Eq (Not (cA (skS.0 0 a a_1) → a (skS.0 0 a a_1))) True)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cP a) False) (Eq (cA (skS.0 0 a a_1) → a (skS.0 0 a a_1)) False)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cP a) False) (Eq (cA (skS.0 0 a a_1)) True)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cP a) False) (Eq (a (skS.0 0 a a_1)) False)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #10 (by superposition #[8, 2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (cA (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #11 (by superposition #[9, 2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq ((fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #13 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cA (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) True
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #15 (by betaEtaReduce #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.49/3.81    Or (Eq (Or (cA (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) (cB (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a))) False)
% 3.49/3.81      (Eq False True)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (cA (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) False)
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #25 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (cA (skS.0 0 (fun Xx => Or (cA Xx) (cB Xx)) a)) False
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #26 (by superposition #[25, 13]): Eq False True
% 3.49/3.81  Clause #28 (by clausification #[26]): False
% 3.49/3.81  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------